This post explains Saint Augustine’s theory of knowledge, focusing on certainty, skepticism, inner truth, divine illumination, and the relationship between faith and reason. Written in simple language, it offers clear revision notes for philosophy students.

Table of Contents

---

Augustine’s Life and Philosophical Development

• Augustine was inspired by Cicero and began a serious search for wisdom.
• He first approached Christianity, became disappointed, then followed Manicheanism, and later adopted skepticism.
• With the help of Neoplatonism and Saint Ambrose, he returned to Christianity and studied Greek philosophy.
• This study gave him intellectual clarity, but he realized that knowledge alone cannot change life.
• True change requires the right direction of the will, not just intellectual understanding.
• Augustine’s conversion involved turning the will away from physical desires toward God.
• His method is “will before intellect”: truth is accepted first, then understood through reason.
• These ideas prepare the ground for his epistemology (theory of knowledge).

Summary

Augustine’s philosophical development shows that intellectual knowledge is important, but real moral and spiritual change depends on the direction of the will, which leads him toward a theory of knowledge centered on truth and God.

---

Purpose of Knowledge and the Highest Good

• Augustine holds that the ultimate goal of human life is happiness.
• Happiness is not external; it is a state of the soul, not of the outer world.
• The soul becomes happy only when it attains what it truly desires.
• Mere fulfillment of desires is not enough; the soul must desire the right object.
• Wrong desires, such as attachment to physical pleasures, do not give lasting satisfaction.
• True happiness comes when the soul desires and attains the highest good (summum bonum).
• For Augustine, the highest good is the love of God.
• Knowledge has a practical purpose: it removes false beliefs and wrong desires.
• By correcting errors, knowledge helps the soul move toward God and true happiness.

Summary

According to Augustine, knowledge exists to guide the soul toward true happiness by freeing it from false beliefs and wrong desires. When knowledge serves this purpose, it helps the soul attain the highest good, which is love of God.

---

Certainty of Knowledge and Skepticism

• To achieve its purpose, knowledge must be certain and reliable.
• Without certainty, knowledge cannot guide the soul toward true happiness.
• Skeptics argue that nothing can be known with complete certainty.
• Because of this, they advise suspending judgment about truth.
• Augustine himself accepted skepticism for a short period in his life.
• He later realized that skepticism destroys the aim of knowledge.
• To refute this view, he wrote Against the Academicians.
• This work attacks Academic Skepticism that developed in Plato’s Academy after his death.
• Carneades was the main figure who systematized this skeptical position.
• Following Plato, Augustine defends the possibility of true and certain knowledge.

Summary

Augustine argues that knowledge must be certain if it is to lead the soul toward happiness and God. By rejecting Academic Skepticism in Against the Academicians, he establishes the possibility of genuine and trustworthy knowledge, which forms the basis of his epistemology.

---

Augustine’s Arguments Against Skepticism

1. Skepticism as a Self-Refuting Position

• Skeptics claim that true knowledge is impossible.
• To deny truth, they must first have some definition of truth.
• That definition is either true or false.
• If it is true, then skeptics already know at least one truth, which contradicts their claim.
• If it is false, then their argument becomes meaningless.
• Therefore, skepticism undermines itself and cannot be consistently maintained.

2. Certain Logical Propositions

• Augustine points to propositions that are always true.
• Example: Either today is Sunday or today is not Sunday.
• Even if we do not know which option is correct, one of them must be true.
• Similar examples include:
  • Either it is raining or it is not raining
  • Either a number is even or not even
• Such propositions show that certainty is possible.

3. Fundamental Logical Principles

• Logical reasoning depends on basic principles of logic.
• One key principle is the law of non-contradiction.
• A statement cannot be true and false at the same time.
• Example: A person cannot be alive and not alive at the same time.
• If skeptics use logical arguments, they already accept these principles as true.
• This shows that skepticism relies on truths it tries to deny.

4. Mathematical Truths

• Augustine also appeals to mathematical knowledge, which is certain.
• Examples include:
  • 2 + 2 = 4
  • A triangle has three sides
  • The angles of a triangle add up to 180 degrees
  • Five is greater than two
  • Parallel lines never meet
• These truths are unchanging and known with certainty.
• Hence, skepticism fails to explain such clear knowledge.

5. The Clever Argument

• Augustine asks: If you know nothing for certain, how do you know skepticism is true?
• If skeptics are unsure whether skepticism itself is true, they have no reason to defend it.
• This makes skepticism philosophically unstable.

Summary

Augustine refutes skepticism by showing that it contradicts itself and ignores clear cases of certainty. Through logical propositions, logical principles, mathematical truths, and a final reflective argument, he demonstrates that true and certain knowledge is not only possible but unavoidable.

---

Skeptical Doubt About the Senses and Its Refutation

1. Skeptical Doubt and Sensory Illusion

• Skeptics argue that sense perception is unreliable and cannot give certain knowledge.
• Sense data may come from dreams, illusions, or hallucinations, so it cannot be trusted fully.
• Example: A pen placed in water appears bent, even though it is actually straight.
• Because senses sometimes give misleading appearances, skeptics conclude that senses are not a reliable source of truth.

2. Augustine’s Reply: Senses Report Appearances Correctly

• Augustine argues that senses never lie.
• The senses only report how things appear, and they do this accurately.
• In the water example, the pen really does appear bent, so the senses are correct.
• The problem begins when we go beyond appearance and make incorrect judgments.

3. Error Lies in Reason, Not in the Senses

• Senses say: “The pen appears bent.”
• Reason wrongly concludes: “The pen is actually bent.”
• Another example: People seen from a tall building appear small.
• It is true that they appear small, but false that they are small.
• Therefore, error arises from reasoning, not from sense perception.

4. Senses, Mind, and the Structure of Experience

• Augustine distinguishes between senses and reason.
• Senses provide raw sensory data exactly as it appears.
• The mind actively interprets and organizes this data.
• Human experience results from the interaction of sense data and mental judgment.
• This basic idea later appears in Kant’s philosophy, where it is developed systematically.

Summary

Augustine refutes skeptical doubt about the senses by arguing that senses truthfully report appearances, while mistakes arise from faulty reasoning. By separating sensory data from judgment, he defends the reliability of sense perception and highlights the active role of the mind in human knowledge.

---

Certainty of Inner Experience and Self-Knowledge

• Augustine defines certainty as knowledge about which error is impossible.
• We may be mistaken about the external world, but we cannot be wrong about our inner states.
• Our thoughts, feelings, doubts, and experiences are immediately known to us.
• Examples include feeling happy or sad, thinking, doubting, or being confused.
• Even doubt itself gives certain knowledge.
• If I doubt, then I am thinking, and if I am thinking, I must exist.
• Error itself presupposes an existing subject who makes the mistake.
• Augustine establishes three levels of certainty:
  • I exist
  • I know that I exist
  • I know that I know that I exist
• This shows that absolutely certain truths do exist and are knowable.
• Much later, Descartes uses the same insight in “I think, therefore I am”.
• Both medieval and modern philosophy begin with certainty of the self.
• Since skepticism fails, the task of philosophy is to search for and attain true knowledge.

Summary

Augustine argues that while external knowledge can be doubted, inner experience and self-existence are absolutely certain. By showing that doubt itself proves existence, he refutes skepticism and establishes self-knowledge as the foundation of certain knowledge, anticipating Descartes and shaping both medieval and modern philosophy.

---

Nature of Knowledge and Inward Truths in Augustine

1. Nature of Certain Knowledge

• Augustine argues that true knowledge is possible, and it must be certain, absolute, and unchanging.
• Knowledge gained through the senses cannot be perfect, because the physical world is always changing.
• True knowledge cannot come directly from sense experience alone.
• Augustine uses Platonic concepts to explain knowledge, but he does not reject the senses completely.
• Unlike Plato, Augustine does not harshly criticize the senses, since both the world and the senses are created by God.
• The mind or soul is the real knower, while the body and senses act only as instruments.

2. Nature of Inward Truths

• Augustine holds that the mind already contains certain inner truths or perfect ideas.
• These inward truths are not learned from the senses.
• Examples include ideas such as beauty, goodness, equality, and truth.
• Because these truths are already within us, we can judge and evaluate sense data.
• Augustine therefore advises: do not search for truth outside; return inward, because truth resides within the soul.
• This idea is supported both by Plato’s theory of Forms and the Biblical view that the soul is made in the image of God.

3. How the Mind Becomes Aware of These Truths

• The senses provide only raw data such as color, shape, and sound.
• The mind actively organizes and judges this data.
• Example: Eyes see a painting, but the mind judges it as beautiful.
• Without an inner idea of beauty, such judgment would be impossible.
• Similarly, moral judgments like good and bad are possible because ethical principles already exist in the soul.
• Augustine, like Plato, distinguishes between lower physical reality and higher eternal reality.
• Mathematical truths are examples of this higher, unchanging reality.
• Thus, the mind becomes aware of inward truths by reflecting inwardly, not by relying only on the senses.

Summary

Augustine explains knowledge by distinguishing sense experience from inward truths. While senses provide raw data, true and certain knowledge depends on inner, eternal truths already present in the soul. By turning inward, the mind becomes aware of these truths and uses them to judge beauty, morality, and reality itself.

---

Divine Illumination and Knowledge of Eternal Truths

1. The Problem: How the Mind Knows Eternal Truths

• Eternal truths are unchanging, absolute, and not given by the senses.
• The mind uses these truths to judge sense data, but does not receive them from the senses.
• The key question is: How does the mind become aware of such truths?
• Augustine answers this through the Theory of Divine Illumination.

2. Theory of Divine Illumination

• The mind cannot know eternal truths by itself.
• To know truth, the mind needs God’s light (divine illumination).
• Augustine uses the sunlight analogy:
  • Eyes exist, but without sunlight they cannot see.
  • Similarly, the mind exists, but without divine light it cannot know truth.
• God’s light does not create truth, but makes truth visible to the mind.

3. Truths Are Not Inbuilt in the Mind

• Augustine rejects the view that eternal truths are already stored inside the mind.
• If truths were inbuilt, reason alone would be enough, and faith and God would be unnecessary.
• Eternal truths exist independently of the human mind.
• The mind discovers these truths; it does not create them.
• The mind is active, but cannot function without God’s help.

4. Divine Illumination and Atheists

• Divine illumination is not mystical or supernatural in a special sense.
• Every act of knowing depends on God’s light, whether one believes in God or not.
• Even atheists rely on divine illumination to know:
  • Mathematical truths
  • Logical principles
  • …and more.
• Like sunlight, God’s light is used by everyone, though many do not recognize its source.

5. Rejection of Plato’s Theory of Recollection

• Plato argues that the soul knew truths in a previous life.
• Learning is therefore recollection of forgotten knowledge.
• Augustine rejects this view because:
  • Christianity denies pre-existence of the soul.
  • Each soul is a fresh creation by God.
  • Knowledge must come from God, not from a past life.
• Accepting recollection would make God unnecessary in knowledge.

6. Augustine’s Meaning of “Remembering”

• Augustine uses the word “remember”, but with a different meaning than Plato.
• For Augustine, remembering means:
  • Becoming aware
  • Paying attention
  • Noticing what is already present
• Eternal truths are always present before the mind through divine light.
• We fail to know them when we do not attend to them.
• Knowledge occurs when the mind turns its attention inward.

7. Final Structure of Knowledge in Augustine

• Augustine’s position can be summarized in three clear points:
  • Senses play no role in knowing eternal truths.
  • Reason alone is insufficient.
  • God’s illumination is primary and necessary.
• Knowledge occurs when the mind, illuminated by God, uses reason to grasp truth.
• God’s light comes first; reason follows.

Summary

Augustine explains the knowledge of eternal truths through divine illumination. Eternal truths are neither inborn nor recalled from a past life but are known when God’s light enables the mind to recognize them. Reason works only after illumination, making God essential to all genuine knowledge.

---

Faith and Reason in Augustine’s Philosophy

1. Faith and Reason: Not Two Separate Paths

• Augustine agrees with Plato on many points, but differs sharply on faith.
• For Augustine, faith and reason are not alternatives.
• One cannot say: “I will use only reason and reject faith.”
• Reason cannot function properly without faith.
• Faith and reason are interconnected, not independent routes to truth.

2. Why Faith Is Necessary for Reason

• If reason alone were sufficient, faith would become unnecessary.
• Augustine rejects the idea that reason is a neutral tool.
• Human reason is deeply influenced by:
  • Desires
  • Emotions
  • Moral character
  • Faith and values
• Unlike a calculator, human reason does not operate mechanically or neutrally.
• What reason accepts or rejects depends on the condition of the heart.

3. Knowledge of the Good vs Doing the Good

• Socrates claimed: If you know the good, you will do the good.
• Augustine disagrees.
• People often know what is right, yet still choose what is wrong.
• Therefore, knowledge alone does not guarantee moral action.
• The will and moral orientation determine whether reason’s conclusions are followed.

4. Illustration: The Alcohol Example

• A demonstration shows a donkey choosing water over alcohol.
• The observer wrongly concludes that avoiding alcohol is foolish.
• The example shows that interpretation of evidence depends on inner attitudes.
• Reason does not force correct conclusions; the heart decides how reason is used.

5. Faith as Right Orientation of the Mind

• Augustine compares reason to eyes and faith to direction.
• Even with light and healthy eyes, truth is missed if we look in the wrong direction.
• Faith orients reason toward truth.
• Without faith, reason may work, but it moves in the wrong direction.

6. Faith Seeks, Understanding Finds

• Augustine’s famous idea: “Faith seeks; understanding finds.”
• Faith comes first, guiding the soul toward truth.
• Reason follows, deepening understanding.
• Understanding depends not only on intellect, but also on inner moral condition.

7. Augustine’s Personal Example

• Augustine studied the Bible and Greek philosophy deeply.
• He gained intellectual clarity, but his life did not change.
• His soul remained attached to physical pleasures.
• True transformation occurred only when his will turned toward God.
• This showed him that knowledge without faith cannot produce goodness.

Summary

For Augustine, reason cannot function properly without faith because reason is shaped by the heart, desires, and moral condition. Faith gives direction to reason, allowing understanding to emerge. Therefore, in Augustine’s philosophy, faith comes first and understanding follows—faith seeks, and reason finds.