Saint Augustine — Life, Works, and the Journey from Manichaeism to Medieval Philosophy

Introduction — Why Life and Philosophy Cannot Be Separated

Most philosophical traditions require you to separate the thinker’s biography from their ideas. With Aristotle, what matters is the argument; the life is secondary. With Augustine, this separation is impossible. His philosophy grew directly from his experience — from his suffering, his moral failures, his intellectual pride, his long resistance to conversion, and the specific moment when that resistance finally broke. The Confessions makes this explicit: it is simultaneously an autobiography, a prayer, and a work of philosophy. To understand the ideas, you must first understand the life that generated them.

Augustine is the first and greatest philosopher of the medieval period. His ideas dominated Western thought for a thousand years — Augustine’s framework shaped Anselm, Aquinas, Boethius, Dante, and virtually every significant thinker until the Renaissance began to challenge it. Understanding him is not optional equipment for understanding the medieval intellectual world. It is the starting point.

1. Augustine’s Two Major Works

Confessions (397 AD)

The Confessions is one of the most unusual and important books in Western intellectual history. Augustine wrote it around 397 AD, when he was approximately forty-three years old and had been a Christian for about eleven years. He had finally attained what he had spent his entire adult life searching for: a certainty, a satisfaction, a peace. From that vantage point, he looked back at everything that had come before and wrote about it — addressed not to a human reader but to God, in the form of an extended prayer.

Its two claims to uniqueness are both genuine. It is the first autobiography in Western literature — the first time a significant writer had turned the focus from the external world to their own interior life. Prior writers described nature, history, politics, and philosophical arguments. Augustine described himself: his desires, his doubts, his pride, his failures, his moments of illumination and collapse. The interior life — what it actually feels like to be a thinking, struggling, sinning, seeking human being — became the subject of serious writing for the first time.

And it is extraordinarily honest. Augustine does not present himself as a hero or a saint looking back. He presents himself as someone who was, for most of his life, confused, self-deceived, morally weak, and intellectually arrogant. His childhood petty thefts are analysed as philosophical examples. His sexual life is described with frank self-criticism. His years of intellectual pride — believing he could solve everything through reason — are exposed as a form of evil. This level of transparency was unprecedented and has never been fully matched.

City of God (413–426 AD)

The City of God was written in response to a specific historical crisis. In 410 AD, the Visigoths sacked Rome — an event so shocking to the ancient world that it seemed to signal the collapse of civilisation itself. Pagan Romans immediately blamed the Christians: you abandoned the old gods; in return, the old gods abandoned Rome. Augustine’s response was a twenty-two-book philosophical argument that took thirteen years to complete.

His central thesis is that history is not a series of random events. Every historical event is connected to every other; history is moving in a direction toward a purpose. He distinguishes the City of God — the spiritual community of those who love God — from the City of Man — the earthly political community organised around self-love. The earthly city is temporary and impermanent; the City of God is eternal. Rome’s fall is not a defeat of God’s plan; it is a moment in a larger movement that history is making toward its divine destination.

This was the first systematic philosophy of history in Western thought. The idea that history has direction and purpose — rather than being a cycle (Greek view) or a series of random events — was Augustine’s innovation, and it took many centuries to fully develop. Hegel’s philosophy of history, Marx’s historical materialism, and even Nietzsche’s engagement with history are all, in different ways, responses to the question Augustine first posed.

2. The Historical Context — Why 354 AD Matters

The year of a philosopher’s birth is not merely a fact to memorise. It is a key that opens the historical context in which they formed — and historical context is what makes a thinker who they are.

The thought experiment: Augustine was born in 354 AD. If he had been born a hundred years earlier — say, in 254 AD — Christianity would not yet have been legal (the Edict of Milan came in 313 AD). In that world, Augustine might have been executed for conversion, or might have grown up as a pagan philosopher like Plotinus, his exact contemporary in the Neoplatonist tradition. If he had been born a hundred years later — say, in 454 AD — the Western Roman Empire was already in terminal collapse. His education, his cultural formation, everything that shaped his thinking would have been entirely different. What makes Augustine specifically Augustine is the intersection of forces that existed at the exact moment and place he was born.

The relevant history of the decades immediately before Augustine’s birth:

• 303 AD: Emperor Diocletian ordered the systematic destruction of all Christian churches and books, and the persecution of Christians. This lasted approximately two years.
• 312 AD: Constantine became Roman Emperor. During the battle for the throne, he reportedly had a vision of a cross with the inscription: ‘In this sign, conquer.’ He attributed his victory to the Christian God. The Edict of Milan (313 AD) established religious tolerance throughout the Empire.
• 325 AD: Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea to resolve the Arian controversy — the same council that produced the Nicene Creed. Constantine supported Christianity actively without declaring it the state religion.
• Late 4th century: Successive emperors continued to support Christianity. Eventually, Christianity was declared the official state religion of the Roman Empire — an extraordinary reversal from persecution to imperial status within one century.

Augustine was born in 354 AD into this world — a world where Christianity was legal and increasingly powerful but Greek philosophy remained culturally dominant, Roman political structures were beginning to destabilise, and the intellectual landscape included multiple competing traditions: Christianity, Neoplatonism, Manichaeism, Scepticism, and others. He was the product of all of them.

3. Augustine’s Life — The Biographical Sketch

Augustine was born in Tagaste, a small town in North Africa (present-day Algeria). His father was a pagan; his mother, Monica, was a devout Christian who profoundly influenced her son’s eventual direction, though only after decades of waiting. The tension between these two parental influences — pagan intellectual culture and Christian faith — was never fully resolved in Augustine’s early life, and its resolution became the central drama of his philosophical journey.

He was an exceptionally gifted student. He studied literature and then rhetoric — the art of persuasion and argument, the foundational skill of Roman public life. At sixteen he was sent to Carthage, one of the great cities of the Roman world, for advanced study. There he took a mistress, with whom he lived for approximately fifteen years, and with whom he had a son, Adeodatus. He was also introduced to legal thinking, though his philosophical training at this stage was minimal.

The trajectory of his career took him from Carthage to Rome to Milan, following the most prestigious teaching positions available. In Milan, the final transformation occurred. He was baptised there in 387 AD. He returned to North Africa, eventually established a monastic community, was ordained as a priest, and was made Bishop of Hippo around 395 AD. He remained there as bishop until his death in 430 AD — the year the Vandals besieged the city. He died while the city was under siege.

4. The Seven-Stage Philosophical Journey

Augustine’s philosophical development can be mapped as a sequence of seven stages, each representing an encounter with a system that promised the wisdom and certainty he was seeking — and each ultimately failing to fully deliver it, until the last.

Stage One — Cicero and the Fire of Wisdom

At nineteen, Augustine read the Hortensius — a now-lost philosophical work by Cicero that argued for the supreme importance of seeking wisdom. The effect was immediate and permanent. ‘This book truly changed my outlook,’ Augustine later wrote. ‘It changed my prayers to you, Lord, and gave me new aims and desires. Suddenly I thought of nothing but wisdom — I burned to seek it wherever I could find it.’

This desire — the burning desire for wisdom, for genuine and certain knowledge of the truth — became the engine of everything that followed. Every subsequent stage in his journey was an attempt to satisfy this desire. The frustrations, the conversions, the philosophical explorations — all of them are driven by this single original spark ignited by Cicero.

Stage Two — The Bible and Its Problems

In the Christian context, Jesus was understood as the incarnation of divine wisdom — the Logos. For someone seeking wisdom, the Bible was the obvious first destination. Augustine turned to it with genuine hope. He found it disappointing.

Two problems struck him immediately. The first was literary: the Bible seemed stylistically crude compared to Cicero, lacking the elegance and rhetorical sophistication that he valued. The second was theological: the Old Testament described God in strikingly physical terms — God walking in the garden of Eden, God resting on the seventh day, God’s hands and face and voice. If God is omnipresent (everywhere at once), how can God have a physical body? A physical body can only be in one place at a time.

Beneath both problems lay the deeper challenge: if God is all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good — the Triple-O God of orthodox theology — why does evil exist in the world? This was not an abstract puzzle for Augustine; it was personal and urgent. He needed an answer before he could accept the Christian framework.

Stage Three — Manichaeism and Its Nine-Year Hold

Why Manichaeism was attractive: The Manichean solution to the Problem of Evil seemed, to Augustine at nineteen, genuinely rational. Two co-eternal powers — God (good) and Satan (evil) — account for the presence of both goodness and evil in the world without compromising God’s goodness. God is not responsible for evil because Satan is an independent and equally real force. The world is the site of their ongoing struggle, which maps directly onto the struggle within the human person between soul (divine) and body (material/Satanic).

Manichaeism also provided Augustine with psychological comfort of a specific kind. If the body and all material things are Satan’s domain — if matter is inherently evil — then his own moral failures (his sexual desires, his dishonesty, his self-indulgence) could be attributed to the body rather than to his soul. ‘My soul is good; it is the body that forces me to these things.’ The absolution was built into the metaphysics: blame matter; your soul is innocent.

Augustine followed Manichaeism for nine years — not half-heartedly but with characteristic total commitment. When the great Manichean teacher Faustus visited Carthage, Augustine went to him with all his accumulated questions — the doubts and difficulties that had been building. He found, to his dismay, that Faustus was intellectually shallow — eloquent and charming but without genuine philosophical substance. A man with answers on his lips but nothing behind them. The encounter broke Augustine’s faith in Manichaeism. He left the tradition.

Stage Four — Scepticism (Brief)

After nine years in Manichaeism, Augustine was philosophically homeless. He had found problems with Christianity; Manichaeism had failed him; he had no other positive system to turn to. The Academic Sceptics offered a position that required no positive commitment: since certainty is impossible and all claims can be challenged, withhold judgment on everything. This was not a satisfying destination, but it was a defensible holding position. Augustine adopted it briefly — a period of philosophical suspension before the next phase.

Stage Five — Neoplatonism and Two Crucial Discoveries

In Milan, Augustine encountered the writings of Plotinus — and received two insights that would permanently reshape his understanding.

The first concerned the nature of God. The Old Testament’s apparently physical God had been a stumbling block. Plotinus’s account of the One — absolutely immaterial, beyond space and time, present everywhere precisely because it is not located anywhere — provided Augustine with a philosophical framework for understanding what the biblical descriptions actually meant. God is pure spirit, not a physical being. The biblical passages that seem to describe God physically must be read symbolically. This resolved the omnipresence problem and opened the way for a serious intellectual engagement with Christianity.

The second concerned the nature of evil — and it was even more philosophically decisive. Plotinus had argued that evil is not a positive substance but a privation: the absence of good, not an independent force. Like darkness, which is not a thing but the absence of light. Like silence, which is not a sound but the absence of sound. Like a window in a wall, which is not a thing but an absence of wall.

The light and darkness analogy: In Plotinus’s emanation hierarchy, the One is the source of all being and goodness. As reality emanates outward from the One — through Nous, through Soul, into matter — goodness progressively diminishes, like light growing dimmer as it moves from its source. At the extreme distance from the One, where the light has entirely faded, there is darkness — what we call evil. But this darkness is not a force opposing the light; it is simply where the light has not reached. It has no independent existence, no substance, no source that needs to be separately identified and explained.

This was the insight that finally broke the spell of Manichaeism for Augustine. If evil is merely the privation of good — if it has no positive existence of its own — then there is no need for an evil God, no need for two co-eternal powers, no need for the metaphysical dualism that destroys monotheism. The Problem of Evil can be answered within a strictly monotheistic framework. This became, in Augustine’s hands, the standard Christian answer — and Aquinas accepted it without modification five centuries later.

Stage Six — Ambrose and the Bible Read Anew

Monica, Augustine’s mother, had moved to Milan and had connections to its bishop, Ambrose — one of the most intellectually formidable Christian figures of the era. Ambrose was unusual among Christian leaders of his time: he had deep knowledge of Greek philosophy, particularly Plato and Plotinus, and used it without apology in his theological work.

Ambrose showed Augustine two things that changed his understanding of Christianity entirely.

First: Greek philosophy and Christian faith are not enemies. The Neoplatonist tradition — with its immaterial One, its emanation hierarchy, its account of the soul’s return to its divine source — was in many ways a philosophical parallel to Christian theology, not a contradiction of it. The work Ambrose had done in reading Plato and Plotinus as precursors to Christian truth opened a path that Augustine then spent his life developing.

Second: the Bible can be read symbolically. The passages that had seemed crudely physical to Augustine — God walking, God’s hand, God’s face — need not be read as literal descriptions. They are signs pointing toward deeper spiritual truths. To insist on reading them literally is to mistake the finger for the moon it is pointing toward.

The moon and the finger parable: A great sage pointed toward the moon and said: ‘This is the truth.’ The people looked not at the moon but at his finger. Some began studying the finger — its skin, its bones, its composition. The sage said: ‘Look at the moon; don’t bite the finger.’ The finger is a signpost, a medium, a pointer — not the truth itself. Religious stories, biblical narratives, and parables are like this: they point toward truths that cannot be directly stated. Examining them as if they were literal facts is examining the finger instead of looking at the moon.

The fox and the grapes: A fox cannot reach the grapes growing high on a vine. She turns away, saying ‘they were sour anyway.’ Taken literally, this is absurd — foxes don’t speak. But the story is not about foxes and grapes. It is about the human tendency to rationalise failure by devaluing the unattained goal. The literal level is not where the truth lives; the moral is what matters. Ambrose taught Augustine to read the Bible this way.

5. The Will — Augustine’s Most Original Contribution

Before reaching the climax of Augustine’s journey, it is essential to understand the concept that is most distinctively his own and most important for all of medieval philosophy that follows: the concept of the will.

Augustine noticed that something in his psychological life did not fit any of the categories available to him. It was not desire (which is a feeling that comes and goes, that you undergo); not emotion (anger, joy — states that happen to you); not intellect (reason — the faculty that identifies right from wrong, good from bad). Something else was directing him, something more fundamental than any of these.

Augustine’s definition of will:  Will (Latin: voluntas) is the soul’s power of direction — the faculty that chooses which way the soul will go. It is not a feeling, not a mood, not a state. It is an act of commitment: the soul orienting itself toward something and moving in that direction.

Three examples clarify what will is NOT:

• Will is not desire. Desire is a feeling — ‘I want cake, I feel pulled toward it.’ Will decides whether you eat the cake or not. The desire can be present without the will following it, and the will can act against the desire.
• Will is not emotion. You feel anger without choosing to — it arises. But whether you ACT on the anger, whether you speak or strike or walk away — that is the will. Emotion is passive; will is active.
• Will is not intellect. The intellect tells you that smoking causes cancer and that you should stop. Will decides whether you stop. Intellect provides the information and the judgment; will makes the move.

This distinction has enormous consequences. For the Greek tradition (especially Socrates), reason and will are unified: if you genuinely know the right thing, you will do it. For Augustine (following Paul), reason and will are split: you can know perfectly well what is right and still fail to do it — because the will has its own history, its own entrenched patterns, its own imprisonment.

6. The Four Stages of the Will’s Enslavement

Augustine’s analysis of how the will becomes enslaved — drawn directly from his own experience — is one of the most psychologically precise passages in ancient philosophy. It describes a four-stage process by which free choice hardens into compulsion.

Augustine lived this four-stage process himself. For thirteen years he struggled — knowing the truth, wanting to change, unable to follow through. The iron chain he describes is not a metaphor for an abstract condition; it is a precise description of his daily experience.

The addiction examples: A person has diabetes but cannot stop eating sugar. A person begins drinking and cannot stop until it has consumed their life. A student has genuine potential but is so deeply captured by mobile phone addiction that their potential disappears. These are not failures of knowledge (all these people know what they are doing); they are failures at the level of necessity — the fourth stage of the chain. ‘Death barely comes to some people,’ the lecturer observes; ‘most people go to death themselves, digging their own graves with full awareness and inability to stop.’

The logical and theological conclusion from this analysis is what makes it so significant: if the will can become so enslaved that it cannot free itself by its own power, then external help is required. For Augustine, that external help is divine grace — God’s power working within the person to reorient the will that cannot reorient itself. This is why Paul was right, and Pelagius was wrong. The will is not merely weak — it can become genuinely incapable of right action without assistance from outside itself.

7. The Conversion — The Garden in Milan (386 AD)

The intellectual problems had been resolved: Ambrose had shown how to read the Bible; Plotinus had provided the immaterial God and the privation theory of evil; Christianity and Greek philosophy had been shown to be complementary rather than opposed. Augustine knew what was true. And yet nothing in his life changed.

He was in exactly the condition Paul had described: ‘I know the right thing; I cannot do it.’ His sexual life, his habits, his attachments — all continued as before. For years, he had prayed a prayer that he later describes with devastating honesty:

The famous prayer: ‘Make me pure, Lord — but not yet.’ He wanted to be different; he was not ready to be different. He wanted God to transform him; he also wanted to keep his pleasures a little longer. The will that should have surrendered was still fighting for both things at once — unable to let go of either.

The breaking point came through a story his friend told him. Two men at a circus had wandered away from the crowd, found a small cottage, and discovered inside it the Life of Saint Anthony — the story of a fourth-century ascetic who had renounced everything to serve God. The two men read it, and by the time they finished, both had made an immediate, irrevocable decision: they would do the same. They did not return to the circus.

This story overwhelmed Augustine. He rushed into the garden beside the house where he was staying and threw himself down beneath a fig tree, weeping. He cried out to himself: How long? How long will I keep saying ‘tomorrow, tomorrow’? Why not now? Why not put an end to this moment to my own corruption?

He could hear his old habits calling to him — not in words but as a kind of pull on his consciousness. He described it later as voices pulling at his flesh, asking: ‘Can you live without us? Do you think you can give us up?’ And alongside them, he felt the pull of the new — the possibility of a different life, which he had been approaching for years without quite arriving.

Then he heard a child’s voice from nearby, chanting repeatedly: Tolle, lege! Tolle, lege! — ‘Take up and read! Take up and read!’ He did not know if it was a game the child was playing; but he interpreted it as a divine command. He picked up Paul’s letter. He opened it at random. He read:

The passage from Romans 13:13–14 (Augustine’s words):  ‘Not in revelling and drunkenness, not in lust and wantonness, not in quarrels and rivalries. Rather, arm yourselves with the Lord Jesus Christ; spend no more thought on nature and nature’s appetites.’

He did not read any further. He did not need to. He later wrote: ‘In an instant, as I came to the end of the sentence, it was as though the light of confidence flooded into my heart and all the darkness of doubt was dispelled.’

The will that had been paralysed for thirteen years moved — suddenly, completely, without residue. Augustine surrendered. He was baptised by Ambrose in 387 AD. He returned to North Africa, established a monastic community, was ordained a priest, and eventually became Bishop of Hippo. He remained there for the rest of his life.

8. Faith First, Understanding Second — Crede ut Intelligas

The conversion experience clarified a philosophical position that Augustine had been approaching through his biographical journey but had not yet articulated: the proper relationship between faith and reason, between will and intellect.

The Greek philosophical tradition had always placed intellect first. Understand, and then accept. Reason your way to truth, and then assent to what reason has established. This approach was philosophically respectable — but it had produced, across five centuries of Greek philosophy, total disagreement. Thales said reality is water; Democritus said atoms; Plato said Forms; Aristotle said substance and form. Each philosopher reasoned carefully and arrived at a different answer.

Augustine’s method is the reverse. The will acts first — through faith, it accepts the revealed answer as given. Then the intellect goes to work, exploring and understanding what has been accepted. This is not irrationalism; it is a different sequencing of the same two faculties.

The mathematics analogy: You are given a mathematics problem and cannot solve it after sustained effort. You turn to the back of the book, where the answer is given. You accept the answer as given. Now you work backward: starting from the answer, you trace the reasoning that leads to it, understanding each step in a way that working forward had not allowed. This is not cheating; it is a different and sometimes more productive method of understanding. The answer becomes the starting point for understanding.

Augustine’s master principle:  Crede ut intelligas — ‘Believe in order that you may understand.’ Faith is not the enemy of understanding; it is its prerequisite. Without faith orienting the will, the intellect is working without direction and arrives at disagreement. With faith establishing the direction, the intellect can explore productively within a coherent framework. Faith and reason are not opponents; they are partners in sequence.

This principle has a further implication that Augustine draws with great clarity: philosophy and theology, reason and faith, cannot be separated. For a Greek philosopher, philosophy operates independently of religion. For Augustine, this is impossible. Without faith, understanding cannot reach its deepest level. And therefore: without theology, philosophy cannot reach its highest questions. The two are not competing disciplines; they are two aspects of a single integrated pursuit of truth.

9. Evil as Privation — The Definitive Answer

Alongside the will, the other central philosophical contribution introduced in this lecture is the privation theory of evil — the solution to the Problem of Evil that Augustine developed from Plotinus and made the foundation of Christian thought on the subject.

Augustine’s personal journey through this problem is philosophically revealing. He spent nine years as a Manichean precisely because Manichaeism offered the most rational-seeming solution to the Problem of Evil. Evil has a source — Satan — who is as real and as eternal as God. The solution is clean and logical.

But it destroys monotheism. If Satan is co-eternal and co-equal with God, Christianity has become a form of dualism — two ultimate principles, not one. And Augustine could not accept this. He was a rigorous monotheist who had inherited the Jewish-Christian conviction that there is only one God, one eternal reality.

Plotinus offered the escape. Evil is not a substance; it is an absence. The question ‘Where does evil come from?’ is a category error — like asking ‘Where does the hole in the donut come from?’ A hole is not a thing; it is the absence of a thing. Evil is where goodness has not reached. It is real in the sense that the darkness of night is real — but it is not a force, not a substance, not something that needs an independent cause. The sun’s light diminishes as it moves from its source; eventually there is only darkness. But the darkness did not come from anywhere; it is simply where the light ran out.

10. Sin, Pride, and the Guilt of Childhood

The Confessions displays one of Augustine’s most philosophically distinctive features: the capacity to find profound philosophical meaning in apparently trivial events. His analysis of two childhood incidents reveals the core of his understanding of sin.

The Pear Theft

The pear theft story: As a teenager, Augustine and some friends stole pears from a neighbour’s tree. They didn’t want the pears. They weren’t hungry. After taking them, they threw most away or fed them to pigs. Why did they do it? Augustine asks himself this question with serious philosophical intent. The answer he arrives at: they wanted to do something forbidden. The act of transgressing a rule — of asserting that no rule applies to them, that they are above the law — was itself the pleasure. Not the pears but the theft.

This, Augustine argues, is the structure of original sin. Adam and Eve did not eat the fruit because they were hungry; they ate it because they wanted to be like God — to know good and evil for themselves, to be above the rules, to be the source of their own moral law. This is pride: not pride in achievement, but the pride that refuses to be below anything, that refuses dependence, that insists on being the ultimate authority over itself.

The group dimension of the story matters too. Augustine reflects that if he had been alone, he would not have stolen the pears. The group gave the act a social valence: to refuse would have been to seem weak, timid, unwilling to take a risk. This is a social-psychological observation about the power of group dynamics to override individual conscience — an observation as true now as it was in the fourth century.

Intellectual Pride

The Confessions also analyses what Augustine calls his intellectual pride — baudhik ahamkara. He believed, for much of his early adult life, that his reason was sufficient to solve any problem he applied it to. If he could just think carefully enough, he would arrive at the truth. This belief was itself a form of the sin he later identified: pride, the refusal to accept limits, the insistence on being self-sufficient.

The irony he points out is precise: he spent years searching for the source of evil, driven by the Problem of Evil, never seeing that his very way of searching — his arrogant intellectual self-sufficiency — was itself an expression of evil. He was looking outward for the source of evil while the evil was operating within his own disposition. This is the insight of the Confessions: the examined life has to examine itself, not just the world.

Conclusion

Augustine is unique in the history of Western philosophy because his greatest philosophical contributions cannot be separated from the life that generated them. The four-stage analysis of will’s enslavement is autobiography become philosophy. The privation theory of evil is the solution to a problem that his own intellectual journey forced him to face. The principle of faith before understanding is the methodological reflection on a conversion that reversed his entire intellectual direction in a single moment. The Confessions is not a digression from his philosophy — it is his philosophy’s most essential expression.

His influence on the next thousand years of Western thought cannot be overstated. He provided medieval Christianity with its account of evil (privation), its account of will (the power of direction that becomes enslaved and must be freed by grace), its account of the relationship between faith and reason (faith as prerequisite, understanding as the fruit of faith), and its account of history (the City of God moving toward its divine destination). Every major medieval thinker — Anselm, Aquinas, Boethius, Dante — worked within the framework Augustine built.

The personal note on which the Confessions ends — and on which Augustine’s entire journey arrives — is his discovery that the restlessness of the heart is not a failure but a design. ‘You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in you.’ The desire for wisdom that Cicero ignited at nineteen, the restless movement through Manichaeism and Scepticism and Neoplatonism, the long resistance to conversion, the moment of illumination in the garden — all of it, in Augustine’s understanding, was the same journey: the heart moving toward the home it had always been made for.

Frequently Asked Questions